Okay forgive me if you’re not a basketball fan, but tonight’s game seven between the Boston Celtics and Miami Heat is going to have historic implications if Boston wins. Like being down 0-3 and having a mindset to take it one game at time, angel investors must dig deep to make the right deal happen. Reaching one’s goals is all about evaluating the possible roads to success and evaluating the right opportunities. As we explore the evaluating fundamental within Amis’s “Winning Angels: The Seven Fundamentals of Early stage Investing,” let’s look at it from an angel investor perspective and a failed businessman perspective (mine), so as always let me talk to you.
The entrepreneurial evaluation “Harvard Style” is a great framework for angel investors to build awareness of high potential opportunities and incorporates four elements to include people, business opportunity, context, and deal. As we look at the element of people, we dive into the three groups of people to include entrepreneurs, management team, and stakeholders. These three people carry the hopes and goals of the organization and are the catalyst for decisions angel investors must make. As an entrepreneur with no management team or stakeholders, I know I have an uphill battle to climb. I must say learning about the importance of these people was refreshing as most times, we focus on the founder and CEOs with no highlight on the team itself.
Now the next portion we have to break down is the business opportunity portion, which hone in on size, the model, customer, and timing. I will say as a failed businessman, who primarily operated as a sole proprietor, my main enemy was timing. One of the questions within timing was “what substitutes exist or might exist soon” and that question alone made me think about the early days of my decision to start a business. Back in 2013, the internet was still blooming and YouTube influencers were taking the world’s attention by storm. I decided to start a news and event site with the hopes that the company would help me grow as an influencer. I decided to start this way because there weren’t many people doing what I wanted to do, which looking back at it now, causes me to regret the missed opportunities I had.
Finally, to round out this chapter, the book highlights what goes into a deal, which are prices and structures. Another reason why I’m a failed businessman is because I failed to have both, which I know you’re screaming “of course you’re going to fail if you don’t earn money DUMMY.” The book notes how investors will inquire about the price for a product, which is why I know it will be a while before I snag an angel investor (and I’m fine with that). It’s all about playing the long game and before I set my price, I have to continue to evolve with the market and news industry. Well that’s it for now as I broke it down … peace.
Reference
Amis, D., & Stevenson, H.H. (2001). Winning Angels: The Seven Fundamentals of Early-stage Investing.
Hi Greg, I enjoyed your comparison of angel investing to a basketball game. Reading the book, it is evident that there are many odds that are associated with being an angel, and the only way to become better and better is through experience, trial, and error. Like in basketball, it takes a few hard losses to know what winning feels like, and in angel investing, if you don’t fail, you won’t know what it takes to win. The Harvard Style framework is especially helpful to create a winning strategy for an investor seeking to find the winning deals and steer away from the losers. It was actually during this chapter I figured out what the title of the book means “Winning Angels”, not “Losing Angels”. Investing is an art, and the evaluating chapter does a great job at showing us what it takes to become a winning angel.
Greg,
I appreciate how you discuss / break-down the business opportunity portion of the “Harvard Approach.” I like that you’ve used a personal story of opportunities missed (I have a few of them, myself). Timing does seem to be everything, and I imagine there are many angel investors in the game that may wish they would have been early investors in booming companies they’ve passed on. As entrepreneurs, we’re looking to be that booming company, but, as you’ve framed in your reflection, we too, with all our ideas and innovative pursuits are subject to “FOMO.” Are we getting into this market at the “right” time… we may aske ourselves, all while investors are asking themselves the same.
-Amanda